Jean Purcell

"Game Change": New Book with Little to Cheer Us



Posted: Monday, January 11, 2010

by Jean Purcell
OpineBooks.com

Gossip sessions are plentiful on TV and radio, I feel certain. These are not the proverbial, old-time coffee sessions of moms with little children, frequent isolation from other adults, and little time out of the house. These gossip sessions often bear news and interview labels, including books of so-called conservative or liberal slant. They are often full of highly suggestive claims supported by suspicious random facts and gleeful stabs at the "enemy" on the other side of the political fence.

The best way you can expertly identify these cleverly constructed "news and information" sessions is to find a popular news or information program, turn yourself away from the TV, get involved in some activity near it, like chopping carrots or rolling dough or maybe playing a game of solitaire, and just listen closely without watching.

You will be amazed at what your ears pick up--comments fit for gossip mavens in the stereotypical sense. There is a trashing/reporting that hits a lot of the popular folks on the American political, social policy, and election scenes.

The gossipers are mainly men in this reporting age, and they can rival any female stereotypes for serious brutality of their "revelations" about public personalities, particularly in politics and government. They twist some facts and and interpret others out of context. They can make you believe that their perspective is the true one, or that most political people are controlling, jealous, racist, immoral, and/or neurotically or crazily ambitious individuals with staffs paid to cover their shady secrets. That would surprise none of us, but do we need details of supporting evidence?

A new book on the scene early in this year 2010 is an "explosive new book" (Fox TV) Game Change, which fuels this kind of activity. The authors included facts, likely, yet presented with strongly biased slants and descriptions. Isn't this the age-old gossip approach, after all, that uses a few facts to cast a bad light on persons of choice? With books, isn't this the technique aimed to  sell more books and ramp up the heat without serious consideration of fair or true meaning? It's worth thinking about. Decide for yourself if this is reporting or gossip, meaning facts with biased interpretation. Couldn't this be done toward, or against, anyone if done with just the right touches of innuendo and contagious suspicion?

He who goes about as a slanderer reveals secrets,

Therefore do not associate with a gossip
(Proverbs 20:19) .

Jean Purcell -- "I owe all to Christ." Find her blogs for writers through Opinari Writers at http://opinariwriters.blogspot.com and http://authorsupport.blogspot.com.

This Article has been viewed 328 times. (Not updated in real-time.)
Top-level comments on this article: (3 total)
» left by Joyce Dunn
2 years 119 days ago.
33 fans.
Definitely gossip, not reporting, in my opinion. A very large pet peeve of mine also. Most reporting today seems incomplete to me and geared toward shocking and/or simply getting your attention, without including any information that might lead you to do some logical thinking about what was reported. Sad.
» left by Marijo Phelps
2 years 119 days ago.
142 fans.
I guess this is another reason my hubby and I read and do not have TV - we get enough discouraging stuff online - thanks for addressing this Jean! Marijo
» left by Linda DeWitt
2 years 119 days ago.
Interesting article Jean. Trying to find true facts gets more complicated every day. Opinions are abound. Pray for the wisdom to know the difference. Thanks for sharing. Linda D
We want your comments! If you can read this, you don't have javascript enabled, so you can't use this comment system. Please enable javascript.